Financial Regulation and Ethics

General Instructions on Case Write-UpsYour write-up should be 1 to 2 pages, single-spaced, at standard typeface (12 or 14 points).It should briefly (in very few sentences) lay out the basic facts of the case. These are usually generally agreedupon by the time it gets to the final appeal stage; i.e., the Supreme Court or a Federal District court.What is much more important is the issue at law – the dispute about what the law means or how it should beinterpreted.What was the majority of the court’s decision in the case, and – more importantly – what was the basicthe reasoning behind this decision?If you are asked to read a dissent in the case, what was the decision and reasoning in the minority?Do you agree or disagree with the court’s decision? Explain why.To avoid even the appearance of plagiarism, references should be clearly connected to the text throughparentheses (Smith, 2016) or footnotes. It is not enough to put your references at the end of the paper, with noway to see what text connects with each reference.Direct quotes should be in quotation marks or, if more than one sentence, in an indented paragraph. Materialwhich is a close paraphrase of another work, although not a direct quote, should be referenced and explicitlyacknowledged with the expressions like ‘paraphrase,’ ‘in other words,’ ‘to put it another way,’ or somethingsimilar.Text: Chapter 3 Materiality1) SEC v. Howey (U.S. 1946)2) TSC Industries Inc. v. Northway, Inc. (U.S. 1976)3) Basic v. Levinson (U.S. 1988)SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin #99: Materiality

Sample Solution
The post Financial Regulation and Ethics

Image result for Order Now images


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *