Documentation of Historic Sites

Write a thought-piece or short essay that reflects upon a series of readings related to documentationmethods and process. Thought-pieces should not exceed 7 typed, double-spaced pages, nor be shorter than 4pages. In them, you should not merely summarize the content of the essays, but rather analyze theapproach(es) advocated by their authors. What are the implications of what these authors have written for howwe document and interpret historic places? In reading, look for the assumptions, approaches, biases,strengths, and weaknesses of what each scholar has written, providing quotes (and citations) from the text asappropriate to support your conclusions and opinions. The following essays (full citations appear in thesyllabus’ bibliography) describe either ways of conducting research using historic buildings and landscapes, orways of combining field and archival information to interpret historic places. Two are class readings; three arenot. They were written by were employed by institutions of higher education, others work or worked for historicsites and preservation agencies.• Chappell, 1984, “Looking at Buildings”• McDonald, n.d., “Understanding Old Buildings: the Process of Architectural Investigation”• Harris, C., 2001, “Archival Fieldwork”• Herman, 1997, “The Bricoleur Revisted”• Raitz, 2001, “Field Observation, Archives, and Explanation• Ridout, 2014, “Reediting the Architectural Past”

Sample Solution
The post Documentation of Historic Sites

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NOW!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *