How does it add to what you already know about the topic?

How does it add to what you already know about the topic?

What primary sources did the source rely on? Congressional hearings; books, memoirs, and articles published by participants; military documents such as bombing surveys; memoranda and letters written by members of the military and the Truman administration; recent history books and articles on the bomb and the end of the war.

Is the source reliable and convincing? Why or why not? The source is reliable. The author does not seem to favor any reason over another and is careful to say that it was probably some combination. He seems healthily suspicious of any justifications provided by decision makers.

How does the source relate to your project topic? How does it add to what you already know about the topic?

The decision to use the atomic bomb is central to any study of the end of WWII. The decision to use the bomb was the result of many factors, and the Japanese decision to surrender was the result of many factors.

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1957-01-01/decision-use-atomic-bomb

How does it add to what you already know about the topic?

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NOW!!

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *