Palliative and hospice for chronically ill pediatric patient

Palliative and hospice for chronically ill pediatric patient, giving up hope andaccepting the outcome is best form both patient and family.Claims of Opposition with Counter-Argument and Rebuttal – refutationAcknowledges the opposing assertion by conceding to the opposition, but then refutes, or tears down, theopposition’s assertion by proving it wrong, invalid, or unacceptable.Explains a rationale by presenting different points of view on the opposing assertion and then rationalizes as towhy writer’s stance is preferred over the opposition.Demonstrates writer is informed on issue and therefore credible.Must be written in a respectful tone – avoid rude and deprecating language.Phrases that introduce refutation include: “Some may disagree,” “Others may think,” or “Other commonly heldopinions are,” followed by the opposing assertion, which is followed by the CAR.Conclusion:Restate Thesis“So What?” Implications or Call to ActionStrong ethical or emotional appealsClincher

Sample Solution
The post Palliative and hospice for chronically ill pediatric patient

CLICK HERE TO ORDER NOW!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *